The earliest known examples of atomic theory come from ancient Greece and India, where philosophers such as Democritus postulated that all matter was composed of tiny, indivisible and indestructible units. The Rutherford model did not explain radioactive elements behavior, in which neutrons gained energy as they decayed, causing them to move away from their core into the upper parts of the atom. If Thomsons model were correct, the alpha particles would pass through the atomic structure of the foil unimpeded. The plum pudding model is defined by electrons surrounded by a positive charge volume, similar to negatively charged "plums" embedded in a positively charged "pudding". This is a difficult task because of the incredibly small size of the atom. The history of atomic chemistry (video) | Khan Academy Thomson's Atomic Model - Plum Pudding Model and Limitations - VEDANTU Legal. Only some of the s clearly defined atoms had much empty space and the positive charge within the atom is concentrated in a very small volume. _____developed the first model of the atom that showed the structure of the inside of an atom. Non-Abelian Quantum Hall States. This picture works fine for most chemists, but is inadequate for a physicist. . According to the plum pudding model, there were negatively charged particles i.e. 4.13: Plum Pudding Atomic Model - Chemistry LibreTexts Rutherford Scattering - Atomic Nuclei | Atomic Structure - PhET [2] It had also been known for many years that atoms have no net electric charge. ASAP MULTIPLE CHOICE WILL MARK BRAINLIEST What did Ernest Rutherford's model of an atom look like? Accessibility StatementFor more information contact us atinfo@libretexts.orgor check out our status page at https://status.libretexts.org. Even today Thompson's model of the atom continues to be called the Plum Pudding Model. . . Why Should We Not Drink Water In Copper Vessel. In 1909, the physicist Rutherford along with Ernest Marsden performed an experiment which is known as the Rutherford alpha scattering experiment was fired at a foil of gold leaf and it was observed that there were diversions in the track of alpha particles but the diversion was not equal for all particles, some alpha rays faced no diversion while some rays were reflected at 180 degrees. The plum pudding model of the atom states that each atom has an overall negative charge. J.J Thomson's atomic model- Plum pudding model. Why did Thomson's results from experimenting with cathode rays cause a big change in scientific thought about atoms? In magnitude, the negative and the positive charges were equal. According to the theory, an atom was a positively charged sphere with the electrons embedded in it like plums in a Christmas pudding. Though it would come to be discredited in just five years time, Thomsons Plum Pudding Model would prove to be a crucial step in the development of the Standard Model of particle physics. His work in determining that atoms were divisible, as well as the existence of electromagnetic forces within the atom, would also prove to be major influence on the field of quantum physics. A model gives an idea of what something looks like, but is not the real thing. Atomic structures are intriguing and can be fun to learn. This model states that electrons orbit around the nucleus in a manner similar to planets orbiting the sun. However, when the results were published in 1911, they instead implied the presence of a very small nucleus of positive charge at the center of each gold atom. Discovery of the electron and nucleus (article) | Khan Academy Also, another . Thomson's model was the first to assign a specific inner structure to an atom, though his original description did not include mathematical formulas. This means that the nucleus is very small. The flower part that contains ovules is the a. carpel.b. So think of the model as a spherical Christmas cake. He has images of four models of the atom, but they are not in the correct order. This site is using cookies under cookie policy . The plum pudding model was first . No, the only sub-atomic particle in this atomic model was the electron (at the time called the "corpuscle"). 3.4: Rutherford's Experiment- The Nuclear Model of the Atom It was later found to be wrong. According to this model, an atom consist of a sphere of positive matter within which electrostatic forces determined the positioning of the negatively charged . J.J. Thomson's experiments with cathode ray tubes showed that all atoms contain tiny negatively charged subatomic particles or electrons. Rutherfords model was also able to explain the behavior of radioactive elements and chemical reactions. It was observed that as atoms had no charge and the electron and proton had opposite charges, the next step was to determine how these particles were arranged in the atom. This model assumes that electrons are distributed uniformly around the nucleus, which is surrounded by a uniform electron cloud. The model he proposed was named as 'plum pudding model of the atom". The electrons were considered somewhat mobile. This model was proposed by J.J. Thomson, and it was the first atomic theory to use quantum numbers to describe energy levels within an atoms orbitals. The Bohr model was elaborated upon during the time of the "old quantum theory", and then subsumed by the full-fledged development of quantum mechanics.[18][19]. His two students, Hans Geiger and Ernest Marsden, directed a beam of alpha particles at a very thin gold leaf suspended . It is also compared to watermelon because the red edible part of the watermelon is compared to a positively charged sphere and the black seeds that fill the watermelon resemble the electrons of the sphere. This experiment proved the existence of empty space in an atom. Electrons are many thousand times smaller than the nucleus and negatively charged. The plum pudding model. The plum pudding model of the atom states that. This came to be known as the Rutherford Model of the atom. First, J.J. Thomson used this experiment to calculate the ratio between the number of plums that fell within a distance and no plum fell within this certain distance. 2) Atoms are neutrally-charged. positively charged nucleus, just like Rutherford's model, but with The plum pudding model of the atom is also known as the disc model of an atom. HONORS LAB MANUAL - Tenafly High School. The plum pudding model of the atom states that. what is being taught to students (I myself learnt this model at This model shows electrons revolving around the nucleus in a series of concentric circles, like layers of meat in a plum pudding. These corpuscles would later be named electrons, based on the theoretical particle predicted by Anglo-Irish physicist George Johnstone Stoney in 1874. This model was also known as the Watermelon model. Simulate the famous experiment in which he disproved the Plum Pudding . [13] After the scientific discovery of radioactivity, Thomson decided to address it in his model by stating: we must face the problem of the constitution of the atom, and see if we can imagine a model which has in it the potentiality of explaining the remarkable properties shown by radio-active substances [14], Thomson's model changed over the course of its initial publication, finally becoming a model with much more mobility containing electrons revolving in the dense field of positive charge rather than a static structure. The whole atom was electrically neutral. petal. The Plum Pudding Model: how a flawed idea was instrumental in our The ratio of positive to negative charge in plums was found to be different from the ratio of positive to the negative charge in the atom. Why is Thomsons Atomic model also known as the Watermelon Model? What did the Nazis begin using gas chambers instead of mobile killing units and shooting squads after a while? J J Thomson thought of the atom as being a positively charged mass embedded with small negatively charged electrons - a bit like a plum pudding. As Thomson's model guided Rutherford's experiments, Bohr's model guided Moseley's research. Thomson used this model to explain the processes of radioactivity and the transformation of elements. Ever since it was first proposed by Democritus in the 5th century BCE, the atomic model has gone through several refinements over the past few thousand years. The Plum Pudding Model, which was devised by J.J. Thompson by the end of the 19th century, was a crucial step in the development of atomic physics Ernest Rutherford Atomic Theory Model & Experiment Ernest Rutherford Contribution Ernest Rutherford was a New Zealand-born British chemist and physicist known for his pioneering work in the study of radioactivity. The Rutherford model or planetary model was proven in 1911, and it was able to explain these atomic phenomena. Based on its appearance, which consisted of a sea of uniform positive charge with electrons distributed throughout, Thompsons model came to be nicknamed the Plum Pudding Model. What was the positive charge in this model. 3/4/23, 7:54 PM Test: History of the Atom and Atomic Structure | Quizlet 7/7 Proposed the "plum pudding" model of an atom. This is the first recorded incident about subatomic particles called "electrons". Physical Chemistry. After the alpha-scattering experiment, Rutherford concluded in 22.1 The Structure of the Atom - Physics | OpenStax D- Black, pacer. Their professor, Ernest Rutherford, expected to find results consistent with Thomson's atomic model. In Thomson's model of the atom, where were the electrons? The Japanese scientist Hantaro Nagaoka had previously rejected Thomson's Plum Pudding model on the grounds that opposing charges could not penetrate each other, and he counter-proposed a model of the atom that resembled the planet Saturn with rings of electrons revolving around a positive center. This was the first of the subatomic particles of an atom to be discovered. J. J. Thomson, who invented the electron in the year 1897, suggested the atom's plum pudding model in 1904 which was for including the electron in the atomic model. This consists of a sealed glass container with two electrodes that are separated by a vacuum. there is the highest probability of finding an electron. Select all that apply. The plum pudding model is one of several historical scientific models of the atom. It was observed that as atoms had no charge and the electron and proton had opposite charges, the next step was to determine how these particles were arranged in the, Limitations of JJ Thomson Model of Atom (Plum Pudding Model), NCERT Solutions for Class 12 Business Studies, NCERT Solutions for Class 11 Business Studies, NCERT Solutions for Class 10 Social Science, NCERT Solutions for Class 9 Social Science, NCERT Solutions for Class 8 Social Science, CBSE Previous Year Question Papers Class 12, CBSE Previous Year Question Papers Class 10. Famously known as the Plum-pudding model or the watermelon model, he proposed that an atom is made up of a positively charged ball with electrons embedded in it. He has also confirmed with Nagaoka that the electrons move outside the nucleus in circular orbits. A cathode ray tube is made of glass with a small amount of some kind of gas in it. The main disadvantage is that it is wrong. What are the differences between the plum pudding model and the nuclear It is this discovery that led him to hypothesize this model for . While the attempt did not really describe the atomic . each atom has a dense, positively charged center. But Thomson's model explained that atoms are electrically neutral, this model was not able to explain the experiments which were conducted by other scientists. It was proposed by J.J. Thomson in 1904, [1] after the electron had been discovered, but before the atomic nucleus was discovered. Chemical reactions cause atoms to be rearranged. This effectively disproved the notion that the hydrogen atom was the smallest unit of matter, and Thompson went further to suggest that atoms were divisible. When voltage is applied across the electrodes, cathode rays are generated (which take the form of a glowing patch of gas that stretches to the far end of the tube). The Plum Pudding Model A teacher walks into the Classroom and says If only Yesterday was Tomorrow Today would have been a Saturday Which Day did the Teacher make this Statement? The JJ Thomson model is also called the atomic watermelon model because it resembles both spherical plum pudding and watermelon. All atoms of an element are identical. The final goal of each atomic model was to present all the experimental evidence of atoms in the simplest way possible. What is the Plum Pudding Model of the Atom? - tutorialspoint.com Bohrs, Read More Niels Bohr Atomic Model Theory ExperimentContinue, Types of Cast Iron | Cast Iron Properties | Uses of Cast Iron Types of Cast Iron Malleable Cast Iron Malleable iron is obtained by heat treatment of white cast iron, which does not contain carbon in the free graphite form. the Bohr Model). Postulate 1: An atom consists of a positively charged sphere with electrons embedded in it. plum pudding a random mixture of protons, neutrons, and electrons a single, individual atom a nucleus surrounded by electrons. The charged particles in the beams that Thomson studied came from atoms. This model was based on the idea that atoms are made up of a nucleus of protons and neutrons surrounded by electrons and that the nucleus is shaped like the British dessert, plum pudding. But Thomson's atom model failed to explain Rutherford's -particle scattering experiment in which most of the fast-moving - particles went through the gold foil straight away. Geiger and Marsden concluded that the particles had encountered an electrostatic force far greater than that allowed for by Thomsons model. thinking about the smallest particles of matter without experimenting. The electrons were the negative plums embedded in a positive pudding. In the early 1900's, the plum pudding model was the accepted model of the atom. Assignment 2 - gvfdsgd - over the years, researchers have refined our The 'Plum Pudding Model' is one of the many theories that were hypothesized to explain atomic structure, in the beginning of the 20 th century. 9. Answers: 3 . The existence of protons was also known, as was the fact that atoms were neutral in charge. In addition, the fact that those particles that were not deflected passed through unimpeded meant that these positive spaces were separated by vast gulfs of empty space. Plum Pudding Model - Science Struck What experimental evidence led to the development of this atomic model from the one before it? In 1903, he became the first person to demonstrate that radioactive materials emit energy in a continuous stream of particles and are not merely energy, Read More Ernest Rutherford Atomic Theory Model & ExperimentContinue, Niels Bohr Atomic Model Theory Experiment Niels Bohr Education & Life Niels Bohr is a well-known Danish physicist that spent the majority of his life studying the atomic model. He further emphasized the need of a theory to help picture the physical and chemical aspects of an atom using the theory of corpuscles and positive charge. The first shell is closest to the nucleus, with up to two electrons per orbital. What do the Latest study on Electrons and the Model of the Atom tell us? The plum pudding model of the atom was the first widely accepted model of the atom. During that time, scientists knew that there was a positive charge in the atom that balanced out the negative charges of the electrons, making the atom neutral, but they . Very few of the particles hit the nucleus. After discovering the electron in 1897, J J Thomson proposed that the atom looked like a plum pudding. Difference Between Thomson and Rutherford Model of Atom Thomsons plum pudding atom is not accurately described by this simple description, but we are still able to see the modern form of it even today. Why would alpha particles pass through the atom in Thompson's plum to determine that electric beams in cathode ray tubes were actually made of particles. His work involved the use of cathode ray tubes and identifying a particle lighter than the atom itself, the electron. atoms. In the modern era, new alloys are designed to produce materials with the desired properties since most metals do not have those desired properties. Proposed in 1904 by J. J. Thomson, the model suggested that the atom was a spherical ball of positive charge, with negatively charged electrons scattered evenly throughout. In the year 1900, J. J. Thomson conducted an experiment called the plum pudding model of the atom that involved passing an electric discharge through a region of gas. Thomson atomic model | Plum pudding model Class 11 - LearnFatafat Who described atoms as small spheres that could not be divided into anything smaller? What did J.J. Thomson's experiments with cathode ray tubes imply about the mass of an electron? Experimental Evidence for the Structure of the Atom - Stanford University The atom theory changed over time because of conflicting experiments which led to revisions, such as when Rutherford revised Thomson's plum-pudding model to include the nucleus. [16] This led to the development of the Rutherford model of the atom. The plum pudding model is defined by electrons surrounded by a positive charge volume, similar to negatively charged "plums" embedded in a positively charged "pudding" (hence, the name). Ans: The five atom is models are as follows: John Dalton's atomic model. The name plum pudding comes from the way how electric charge is spread evenly through the atom, similar to how raisins are scattered within a piece of a plum pudding cake. Answers: 1. { "4.01:_Democritus\'_Idea_of_the_Atom" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.02:_Law_of_Conservation_of_Mass" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.03:_Law_of_Multiple_Proportions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.04:_Law_of_Definite_Proportions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.05:_Mass_Ratio_Calculation" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.06:_Dalton\'s_Atomic_Theory" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.07:_Atom" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.08:_Electrons" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.09:_Protons" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.10:_Neutrons" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.11:_Cathode_Ray_Tube" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.12:_Oil_Drop_Experiment" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.13:_Plum_Pudding_Atomic_Model" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.14:_Gold_Foil_Experiment" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.15:_Atomic_Nucleus" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.16:_Atomic_Number" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.17:_Mass_Number" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.18:_Isotopes" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.19:_Atomic_Mass_Unit" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "4.20:_Calculating_Average_Atomic_Mass" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, { "00:_Front_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "01:_Introduction_to_Chemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "02:_Matter_and_Change" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "03:_Measurements" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "04:_Atomic_Structure" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "05:_Electrons_in_Atoms" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "06:_The_Periodic_Table" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "07:_Chemical_Nomenclature" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "08:_Ionic_and_Metallic_Bonding" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "09:_Covalent_Bonding" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "10:_The_Mole" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "11:_Chemical_Reactions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "12:_Stoichiometry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "13:_States_of_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "14:_The_Behavior_of_Gases" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "15:_Water" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "16:_Solutions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "17:_Thermochemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "18:_Kinetics" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "19:_Equilibrium" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "20:_Entropy_and_Free_Energy" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "21:_Acids_and_Bases" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "22:_Oxidation-Reduction_Reactions" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "23:_Electrochemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "24:_Nuclear_Chemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "25:_Organic_Chemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "26:_Biochemistry" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()", "zz:_Back_Matter" : "property get [Map MindTouch.Deki.Logic.ExtensionProcessorQueryProvider+<>c__DisplayClass228_0.b__1]()" }, [ "article:topic", "showtoc:no", "program:ck12", "license:ck12", "authorname:ck12", "source@https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-chemistry-flexbook-2.0/" ], https://chem.libretexts.org/@app/auth/3/login?returnto=https%3A%2F%2Fchem.libretexts.org%2FBookshelves%2FIntroductory_Chemistry%2FIntroductory_Chemistry_(CK-12)%2F04%253A_Atomic_Structure%2F4.13%253A_Plum_Pudding_Atomic_Model, \( \newcommand{\vecs}[1]{\overset { \scriptstyle \rightharpoonup} {\mathbf{#1}}}\) \( \newcommand{\vecd}[1]{\overset{-\!-\!\rightharpoonup}{\vphantom{a}\smash{#1}}} \)\(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \(\newcommand{\id}{\mathrm{id}}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\) \( \newcommand{\kernel}{\mathrm{null}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\range}{\mathrm{range}\,}\) \( \newcommand{\RealPart}{\mathrm{Re}}\) \( \newcommand{\ImaginaryPart}{\mathrm{Im}}\) \( \newcommand{\Argument}{\mathrm{Arg}}\) \( \newcommand{\norm}[1]{\| #1 \|}\) \( \newcommand{\inner}[2]{\langle #1, #2 \rangle}\) \( \newcommand{\Span}{\mathrm{span}}\)\(\newcommand{\AA}{\unicode[.8,0]{x212B}}\), http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3dx-I.JPG(opens in new window), http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Plum_pudding_atom.svg(opens in new window), source@https://flexbooks.ck12.org/cbook/ck-12-chemistry-flexbook-2.0/, status page at https://status.libretexts.org.